A Senate judge weakens Dem’s drug plan in the economic bill

WASHINGTON (AP) – A Senate MP struck a blow to the Democrats’ plan to curb drug prices on Saturday, but left the rest of their vast economic bill largely intact as party leaders prepared for the first votes on a package that included many of the top national presidents Joe Biden goals.

Elizabeth MacDonough, the House’s impartial arbiter, said legislators must remove the language by imposing severe penalties on drug makers that will raise their prices beyond inflation in the private insurance market. These were the bill’s major price security for an estimated 180 million people whose health insurance comes from private insurance, whether through work or self-purchase.

Other important provisions remained intact, including granting Medicare the right to negotiate how much it pays for drugs for 64 million elderly buyers, a long-standing Democrat goal. Manufacturers’ penalties for exceeding inflation would apply to drugs sold to Medicare, and the annual limit on the cost of drugs and free vaccines for Medicare recipients is $ 2,000.

Its rulings came as Democrats planned to start a Senate vote on Saturday on their wide-ranging package on climate change, energy, healthcare costs, taxes and even deficit reduction. Party leaders said they believed they had the unity they would need to get the bill passed through the 50-50 Senate, with the decisive vote of Vice President Kamala Harris and a solid Republican opposition.

“This is a big win for the American people,” said Senate majority chairman Chuck Schumer, DN.Y. on a bill that both parties use in their election campaigns to put the blame for the worst inflationary period of the decade. “And a sad comment on the Republican Party because they are actively fighting resolutions that cut costs to the American family.”

In response, Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., Said the Democrats “misinterpreted the American people’s indignation as a mandate for another reckless tax and spending madness.” He said Democrats “have already robbed American families through inflation once, and now their solution is to steal from American families a second time.”

Reducing penalties for drug manufacturers reduces the incentives for pharmaceutical companies to cut their fees, increasing costs for patients.

Erasing the language will cut $ 288 billion in 10-year savings, which is estimated to bring Democrat drug restrictions overall – a cut that could be tens of billions of dollars, analysts said.

Schumer said MacDonough’s decision to cap pricing on private insurance was “one unfortunate ruling.” He said, however, that the retained language of drug prices represented a “major victory for the American people” and that the overall bill “remained largely intact.”

The ruling follows a 10-day period in which Democrats resurrected key elements of Biden’s agenda that seemed dead. In swift deals with two of the Democrat’s most unpredictable senators – West Virginia’s first conservative Joe Manchinfollowed by the Arizona centrist Kyrsten Sinema Schumer put together a broad package that, being a fraction of the earlier, larger versions that Manchin had derailed, was an achievement for the party against the backdrop of the fall Congressional elections.

The MP also approved a charge for excess methane emissions, which is a powerful contributor to greenhouse gases from oil and gas wells. It also agreed to environmental subsidies for minority communities and other initiatives to reduce carbon emissionssaid Thomas Carper, D-Del, chairman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.

It approved a provision requiring an EU-wide wage payment if energy efficiency projects are to qualify for tax credits, and another that would limit electric vehicle tax credits to US cars and trucks.

The general measure meets with unanimous opposition from Republicans. But assuming the Democrats resist the constant “vote-frame” of amendments – many designed by Republicans to derail this measure – they should be able to get that measure through the Senate.

The transition to the house may come when this chamber returns briefly from the Friday break.

“What will the a-frame vote look like. It will be like hell, said Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a top Republican in the Senate Budget Committee, said Friday about the forthcoming GOP amendments. By supporting a democratic bill, Manchin and Sinema, he said, “are strengthening legislation that will make life difficult for the average person,” forcing energy costs along with tax increases and making it difficult for companies to hire workers.

The act offers expenditure and tax incentives to switch to cleaner fuels and supports coal by helping to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. Expiring subsidies that help millions of people pay for private insurance premiums would be extended for three years, and $ 4 billion was allocated to help Western states fight drought.

For some corporations that earn over $ 1 billion a year but pay significantly less than the current 21% corporate tax, a new minimum tax of 15% would apply. There would also be a 1% tax on companies that buy back their own shares, swapped after Sinema refused to support higher taxes for directors of private equity firms and hedge fund managers. The IRS budget would be inflated to strengthen tax collection.

While the final cost of the bill is still being determined, a total of over $ 300 billion over 10 years would be spent slowing climate change, which analysts believe would be the country’s largest investment in this effort and billions more on healthcare. This would raise over $ 700 billion in taxes and government savings on drugs, leaving about $ 300 billion for deficit reduction – a modest proportion of the projected 10-year multi-trillion dollar shortfall.

Democrats use special procedures that allow them to pass this measure without reaching the 60-vote majority that the law often needs in the Senate.

It is the parliamentarian’s job to decide whether some laws must be rejected for violating these rules, which require that the laws be primarily aimed at affecting the federal budget rather than imposing new policies.


Associated Press editor Matthew Daly contributed to this report.

Leave a Comment